DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015004754-0002

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2024-06-06

R0554/2024-3

Contested design: 015004754-0002

CDRAppellant: applicant

Outcome

Discontinued / withdrawn

The Board takes note of the withdrawal of the appeal, closes the appeal proceedings, and orders the invalidity applicant to bear the former design holder's appeal costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. Takes note of the withdrawal of the appeal and declares the appeal proceedings closed; 2. Orders the invalidity applicant to bear the costs incurred by the former design holder in the appeal proceedings.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

TABB Interior Systems B.V.via PDF extraction

Netherlands (NL)

Zeusstraat 2, 5048 CA Tilburg, Netherlands

Represented by

AKD N.V.

Holder · RCD owner

VREE Group B.V.via PDF extraction

Netherlands (NL)

Gessel 62, 3454 MZ De Meern, Netherlands

Represented by

Rise

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 6

Argument summary

  • The invalidity applicant sought invalidity of the contested telephone-booth design for lack of novelty and individual character under Article 25(1)(b) CDR read with Articles 4(1), 5 and 6.
  • The Invalidity Division rejected the invalidity application and ordered the invalidity applicant to bear costs, after which that party appealed.
  • During the appeal the parties settled, the invalidity applicant withdrew the appeal, and the Office recorded transfer of the contested RCD from the former holder to the invalidity applicant.
  • The Board held that the withdrawal left the appeal without purpose, closed the proceedings, and ordered the invalidity applicant to bear the former design holder's appeal costs.

Deciding panel

  • ChairS. Stürmann
  • RapporteurA. Pohlmann
  • MemberH. Salmi
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0476/2025-32025-06-05OtherArt 70(3)5
R1723/2023-32024-09-17OtherArt 70(3)5
R0556/2024-32024-06-06OtherArt 70(3)5
R0555/2024-32024-06-06OtherArt 70(3)5
R1962/2022-32023-07-25OtherArt 70(3)5
R0523/2025-32025-07-15Closed without deciding on the meritsArt 70(3)4
R1376/2021-32021-09-30Closed without decisionArt 70(3)4
R1376/2021-32021-09-30Closed without decisionArt 70(3)4