DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005809852-0001

Invalidity appeal · Board of Appeal · 2024-09-17

R1723/2023-3

Contested design: 005809852-0001

CDRAppellant: applicant

Outcome

Discontinued / withdrawn

The Board takes note of the withdrawal of the invalidity request, closes the invalidity and appeal proceedings, and orders the invalidity applicant to bear the design holder's costs in both proceedings.

Show verbatim operative text

1. Takes note of the withdrawal of the request for a declaration of invalidity and declares the invalidity and appeal proceedings closed; 2. Orders the invalidity applicant to bear the costs incurred by the design holder in the invalidity and appeal proceedings.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

PolyTech A/Svia PDF extraction

Denmark (DK)

Industrivej 37, 6740 Bramming, Denmark

Represented by

ZACCO DENMARK A/S

Holder · RCD owner

Dansk Gummi Industri A/Svia PDF extraction

Denmark (DK)

Profilvej 18, 6000 Kolding, Denmark

Represented by

PATRADE A/S

Legal grounds invoked

Art 70(3)

From EUIPO API metadata.

Argument summary

  • PolyTech sought invalidity of RCD No 5 809 852-0001 under Article 25(1)(b) CDR, alleging lack of novelty, lack of individual character, and technically dictated features under Article 8(1) CDR.
  • The Invalidity Division rejected the application and ordered costs against the invalidity applicant; PolyTech then appealed that rejection.
  • After PolyTech withdrew the invalidity application during the appeal, the design holder stated that no agreement on costs had been reached and requested a costs decision.
  • The Board held that the withdrawal deprived both the invalidity and appeal proceedings of purpose, so the contested decision had no effect and the proceedings had to be closed.
  • Applying Article 70(3) CDR, the Board ordered the invalidity applicant to bear the costs incurred by the design holder in the invalidity and appeal proceedings.

Deciding panel

  • ChairS. Stürmann
  • RapporteurC. Negro
  • MemberH. Salmi
  • RegistrarH. Dijkema

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
frFrenchhuman translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
R0476/2025-32025-06-05OtherArt 70(3)5
R0556/2024-32024-06-06OtherArt 70(3)5
R0555/2024-32024-06-06OtherArt 70(3)5
R0554/2024-32024-06-06OtherArt 70(3)5
R1962/2022-32023-07-25OtherArt 70(3)5
R0523/2025-32025-07-15Closed without deciding on the meritsArt 70(3)4
R1376/2021-32021-09-30Closed without decisionArt 70(3)4
R1376/2021-32021-09-30Closed without decisionArt 70(3)4