DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001435499-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-03-20

000010716

Contested design: 001435499-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, the contested Registered Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 001435499-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. Der Inhaber trägt die Kosten der Antragstellerin, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Küberit Profile Systems GmbH & Co. KG

Germany (DE)

Römerweg 9, 58513 Lüdenscheid, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

Georg Sondermann

Germany (DE)

Biggeseestr. 20a, 57489 Drolshagen, Deutschland

Represented by

V. Bezold & Partner

Prior art cited (6)

National designD1

Fußbodenschienen

40200327-0001 · Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt · disclosed 2002-06-25

National designD2
National designD3
National designD4
National designD5
National designD6

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 4(2)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on six earlier German design registrations and arguing that D1 was materially the same floor-profile design.
  • The holder argued that the base profile can remain visible in normal use and that the contested design differed sufficiently, particularly in the cut-out shape and the sector's design constraints.
  • The Division found D1 had been disclosed before the filing date, rejected the claim that Article 4(2) excluded the visible features, and considered designer freedom only partly constrained by function.
  • Comparing D1 with the contested design, the Division found only minor differences and the same overall impression on the informed user, so the design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberStephan HANNE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258