DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001435499-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-03-20

000010717

Contested design: 001435499-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the registered Community design No. 001435499-0002 is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 001435499-0002 wird für nichtig erklärt. Der Inhaber trägt die Kosten der Antragstellerin, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Küberit Profile Systems GmbH & Co. KG

Germany (DE)

Römerweg 9, 58513 Lüdenscheid, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

Georg Sondermann

Germany (DE)

Biggeseestr. 20a, 57489 Drolshagen, Deutschland

Represented by

V. Bezold & Partner

Prior art cited (1)

National designD2

Fußbodenschienen

Nr. 40200327-0002 · Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt Registerauszug · disclosed 2002-06-25

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The invalidity applicant argued that the contested floor-strip design lacked novelty and individual character, relying mainly on six earlier German design registrations, especially D2.
  • The holder denied that the base profile was always invisible in use and argued that the contested design differed sufficiently from the earlier designs despite functional constraints.
  • The Division found D2 had been disclosed before the filing date, rejected the claimed invisibility and purely technical exclusions for key features, and compared the visible designs as a whole.
  • It held that the contested design created no different overall impression from D2, so it lacked individual character and had to be declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberStephan HANNE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258