DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003110733-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-04-05

000010311

Contested design: 003110733-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità è accolta. Il disegno/modello comunitario registrato n. 003110733-0001 è dichiarato nullo. La titolare sopporta l’onere delle spese sostenute dal richiedente, fissate in 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Federal Signal Vama S.A.

Spain (ES)

Dr. Ferran 7, 08339 Vilassar de Dalt, Barcellona, Spagna

Represented by

Javier Ungria Lopez

Holder · RCD owner

Intav S.r.l.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Quarto Negroni, 61, 00040 Ariccia (RM), Italia

Represented by

Barzanò & Zanardo

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDD1

signal lights for vehicles

RCD No 000954482-0003 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2008-07-04

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(2)Article 6(1)Article 7Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and, in the alternative, lack of individual character over earlier RCD D1 for vehicle signal lights.
  • The holder argued key shared features were dictated solely by technical function and pointed to speaker housings, side inserts, and an allegedly crowded sector.
  • The Division found D1 was properly disclosed and held the foldable panel and recess were not excluded technical features under Article 8(1).
  • Novelty failed because the differences were not irrelevant, but the design still lacked individual character since those differences did not change the overall impression from D1.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberPierluigi M. VILLANI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268