DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003110733-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-04-05

000010312

Contested design: 003110733-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità è accolta. Il disegno/modello comunitario registrato n. 003110733-0002 è dichiarato nullo. La titolare sopporta l’onere delle spese sostenute dalla richiedente, fissate in 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Federal Signal Vama S.A.

Spain (ES)

Dr. Ferran 7, 08339 Vilassar de Dalt, Barcellona, Spagna

Represented by

Javier Ungria Lopez

Holder · RCD owner

Intav S.r.l.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Quarto Negroni, 61, 00040 Ariccia (RM), Italia

Represented by

Barzanò & Zanardo

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDD1

vehicle signal light

RCD No. 000954482-0003 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2008-07-04

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 6(1)(b)Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant claimed the vehicle warning-light design lacked novelty and individual character over earlier RCD D1.
  • Holder argued the folding panel and recess were dictated solely by technical function and that the remaining visible differences and sector crowding created a different overall impression.
  • The Division held the rectangular panel and recess were not excluded by Article 8(1), rejected the novelty claim, but found the shared rectangular body, rounded corners, and panel proportions dominated the overall impression.
  • The contested RCD lacked individual character, so the application was upheld and the holder was ordered to bear costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberPierluigi M. VILLANI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268