DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003110733-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-04-05

000010315

Contested design: 003110733-0004

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità è accolta. Il disegno/modello comunitario registrato n. 003110733-0004 è dichiarato nullo. La titolare sopporta l’onere delle spese sostenute dal richiedente, fissate in 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Federal Signal Vama S.A.

Spain (ES)

Dr. Ferran 7, 08339 Vilassar de Dalt, Barcellona, Spagna

Represented by

Javier Ungria Lopez

Holder · RCD owner

Intav S.r.l.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Quarto Negroni, 61, 00040 Ariccia (RM), Italia

Represented by

Barzanò & Zanardo

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDD1

vehicle signalling lights

RCD No 000954482-0003 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2008-07-04

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(2)Article 5Article 6Article 7Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and, in the alternative, lack of individual character over earlier RCD D1 for vehicle signalling lights.
  • Holder argued the foldable panel and recess were solely functional under Article 8(1), stressed speaker and insert differences, and claimed sector crowding reduced design freedom.
  • The Division found D1 was properly disclosed, rejected the purely technical-function objection, and held the designs were not identical but created a very similar overall impression.
  • The invalidity application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character; the RCD was declared invalid and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberPierluigi M. VILLANI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268