DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002009837-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-04-09

000010613

Contested design: 002009837-0003

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 002009837-0003 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

‘GLOBALBASIC’ Elwira Gawron

Poland (PL)

ul. Plac Konstytucji 7/8, 42-290 Blachownia, Poland

Represented by

‘AAK’ Kancelaria Prawna i Patentowa

Anna Korbela

Holder · RCD owner

Krzysztof Różanowski

Poland (PL)

ul. Strzelców Olkuskich 1B/33, 32-300 Olkusz, Poland

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosure

Loft Design decorative panel system in black

www.youtube.com; www.muratorplus.pl; www.facebook.com · YouTube; muratorplus.pl; Facebook · disclosed 2009-10-07

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

white decorative panel

www.facebook.com · Facebook

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier online disclosures of decorative wall panels from 2009 to 2011.
  • The holder filed no timely observations; late submissions received after the deadline were not considered.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of one earlier black Loft Design panel system through YouTube, muratorplus.pl, and corroborating Facebook material, but found other alleged disclosures insufficiently proven.
  • Despite a shared wavy pattern, the contested design's circular forms and vertical stripes created a different overall impression, so the RCD retained individual character and the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000105879

vs Bernhard Hirsch

2020-02-04Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)258
000104699

vs DACHPOL Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością

2020-01-30Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)258
000104079

vs SUZHOU 3DS ENGINEERING PROCUREMENT CONSTRUCTION CO., Ltd.

2019-12-12Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)258
000104060

vs SUZHOU 3DS ENGINEERING PROCUREMENT CONSTRUCTION CO., Ltd.

2019-12-12Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)258
000104059

vs SUZHOU 3DS ENGINEERING PROCUREMENT CONSTRUCTION CO., Ltd.

2019-12-12Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)258
000106301

vs Sports Partner

2019-09-27Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)258
000106281

vs Sports Partner

2019-09-27Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)258
000106280

vs Sports Partner

2019-09-27Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)258