DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003302744-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-04-24

000010702

Contested design: 003302744-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 003302744-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant's costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Eglo Leuchten GmbH

Austria (AT)

Heiligkreuz 22, 6136 Pill, Austria

Represented by

Taylor Wessing

Holder · RCD owner

Yuyao Songxin Electric Appliance Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

173 West Shunyu Road, Yangming Street, Yuyao City, Zhejiang, People's Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

ICLITE outdoor lamp shown in an ALDI-SUED leaflet

https://promoprospekte.de · ALDI-SUED leaflet on promoprospekte.de · disclosed 2015-03-09

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested outdoor lamp lacked novelty and individual character because an almost identical lamp had been marketed in ALDI-SUED stores by March 2015.
  • Holder filed no substantive response and failed to appoint the mandatory EU representative after being invited to do so.
  • The Division accepted the ALDI-SUED leaflet screenshots as sufficient proof of prior disclosure under Article 7 despite the lack of full translation.
  • It found the differences in the cap brim and motion sensor preserved novelty but did not change the overall impression, so individual character was lacking.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was invalidated in full, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberJustas IVANAUSKAS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268