DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003465947-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-04-27

000010738

Contested design: 003465947-0002

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 003465947-0002 is rejected. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Tam Enterprises Limited

United Kingdom (GB)

Stalham Business Park, Rushenden Road, Queenborough ME11 5HE, United Kingdom

Holder · RCD owner

Unicorn Cosmetics Limited

United Kingdom (GB)

Unit 8, Lakeside Park, Neptune Close, Rochester ME2 4LT, United Kingdom

Represented by

Humphreys & Co

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

printout headed 'tartecosmetics' showing cosmetic brushes

disclosed 2016-09-14

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued that the contested cosmetic-brush design lacked novelty and individual character because an earlier similar design had been disclosed online before filing.
  • Holder replied that the applicant's evidence was insufficient to prove any earlier disclosure.
  • The Division held that Article 7 disclosure must be proved by solid, objective, and credible evidence assessed in light of its source and reliability.
  • The submitted printout did not reliably show an Instagram source, publisher, or publication date, and the image quality was too poor to assess all brush details.
  • Because prior disclosure was not proved, the invalidity application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder's fixed costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

04.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000010737

vs Unicorn Cosmetics Limited

2018-04-27Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)048
000010739

vs Unicorn Cosmetics Limited

2018-04-27Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)048
000121258

vs Shenzhen Changyu Technology Co., Ltd.

2024-04-08Art 25(1)(b)047
000114005

vs The Gillette Company LLC

2021-10-12Art 25(1)(b)047
000131844

vs Nanchang Wangxing Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)045
000131548

vs Wenwei Ding

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)045
000130166

vs Nanchang Wangxing Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)045
000131585

vs NOVOWISE LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)045