DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005945466-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-04-08

000121258

Contested design: 005945466-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder’s costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0059454660001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Smart Design GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Alpspitzring 62, 82061 Neuried, Germany

Represented by

Schnick & Garrels

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Changyu Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

202, Building G, No. 89, Industrial Avenue, Fucheng’ao Community, Pinghu Sub-District, Longgang District, Shenzhen, China

Represented by

H&A

Prior art cited (2)

Utility model⚠ rejected as evidence

brush head with rubber nubs

DE 1 649 192 U · German utility model registration

Registered RCD

toilet cleaning brush

RCD No 0037894520001 · EUIPO Register · disclosed 2017-03-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 5(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over a German utility model and an earlier RCD for flat toilet brushes.
  • The holder challenged admissibility and disclosure proof, and argued the designs differed in the head, handle connection, handle shape, and bristle configuration.
  • The Division found the application admissible and admitted supplementary evidence, but held the utility model was not proven disclosed under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • Using the earlier RCD as prior art, the Division found a different overall impression and no identity; the invalidity application was rejected and costs awarded to the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberIneta GALUBICKE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

04.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000114005

vs The Gillette Company LLC

2021-10-12Art 25(1)(b)047
000010737

vs Unicorn Cosmetics Limited

2018-04-27Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)047
000010739

vs Unicorn Cosmetics Limited

2018-04-27Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)047
000010738

vs Unicorn Cosmetics Limited

2018-04-27Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)047
000131844

vs Nanchang Wangxing Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)045
000131548

vs Wenwei Ding

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)045
000130166

vs Nanchang Wangxing Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)045
000131585

vs NOVOWISE LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)045