DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001112155-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-04-30

000010548

Contested design: 001112155-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected; the applicants must bear the holder's costs, fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters Nr. 001112155-0001 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragsteller tragen die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Heskins Ltdvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

Churchill Road Industrial Estate, Brinscall, Chorley, Lancashire PR6 8RQ, Vereinigtes Königreich

Represented by

Downing IP Limited

Holder · RCD owner

Orgatex GmbH & Co. KGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Albert-Einstein-Str. 19, 40764 Langenfeld, Deutschland

Represented by

Demski & Nobbe

Siegfried Demski

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6Article 8(1)Article 8(2)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicants argued the floor-marking design lacked individual character and that its main features were dictated by technical function and standard material and paper dimensions.
  • Holder responded that the dimensions and border width were not technically necessary, alternative sizes and proportions were possible, and the corner lines were merely removable protective strips.
  • The Division found no convincing evidence that the design's essential features were exclusively technically dictated and held that the applicants had not proved any prior design disclosure under Article 7.
  • The invalidity application was rejected in full, and the applicants were ordered to pay the holder's fixed representation costs of EUR 400.

Deciding panel

  • MemberStephan HANNE
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAndré Gerd Günther BOSSE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

20.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000010742

vs Manfred Ezel

2018-12-06Invalidity application rejected206
000010552

vs Waldemar Małyska

2018-06-20Invalidity application rejected206
000010563

vs Waldemar Małyska

2018-06-19Invalidity application rejected206
000114491

vs CRIS-TIM COMPANIE DE FAMILIE SRL

2021-09-22205
000114490

vs CRIS-TIM COMPANIE DE FAMILIE SRL

2021-09-21205
000127918

vs Meng Shen

2025-10-07REUD invalidated203
000125695

vs Wuhan Yaoanxin Trading Co., Ltd.

2024-09-17REUD invalidated203
000117833

vs Xuecong Chen

2023-01-30REUD invalidated203