DesignVerdict
← Back to search
Contested design 015094287-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-06-15

000131364

Contested design: 015094287-0002

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and registered EU design No 015094287-0002 is declared invalid; the holder bears the costs fixed at EUR 720.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 0150942870002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Scoring Right Pty Ltdvia PDF extraction

AU

Langwarrin South, Australia

Represented by

Nicole Sciberras Debono

Holder · RCD owner

Taizhou Huirun Environmental Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Taizhou City, Jiangsu Province, China

Represented by

IP Shield

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureAnnex H

Scoring Right manual slide score counter — two-module racquet-mounted score keeper with two pairs of vertical channels and circular sliders

https://www.instagram.com/tenniszons (post 13/11/2020) · tenniszons Instagram account · disclosed 2020-11-13

Web disclosureAnnex L

Scoring Right manual slide score counter — same product

https://pointgameset.com (Wayback Machine archive 19/06/2024) · pointgameset.com via Wayback Machine · disclosed 2024-06-19

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant (Scoring Right Pty Ltd) argued that its two-module Scoring Right score counter marketed since at least 2019 was disclosed before the contested design's priority date (21/10/2024); both designs share the same elongated two-module rectangular body with four parallel channels and circular slider caps, divided by a wavy serpentine relief.
  • Holder did not submit observations.
  • The Division found prior designs duly disclosed via Instagram (13/11/2020) and Wayback Machine (19/06/2024), both predating the priority date; the contested design reproduces all features of the prior design — same two-module body, channel arrangement and wavy perimeter profile; minor differences in lower module length and absence of sliders are insufficient to create a different overall impression.
  • Application upheld; contested design declared invalid for lack of individual character under Article 6(1)(b) EUDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ-ORLOVSKIENĖ
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

20.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131344

vs Taizhou Huirun Environmental Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-06-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000131365

vs Taizhou Huirun Environmental Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-06-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000127918

vs Meng Shen

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000125695

vs Wuhan Yaoanxin Trading Co., Ltd.

2024-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000117833

vs Xuecong Chen

2023-01-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000113161

vs shenzhen kerchan technology co.,ltd

2021-01-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000105860

vs Televic Conference,

2020-12-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000011187

vs Chris Arathoon

2018-07-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208