DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003527795-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-07-25

000011187

Contested design: 003527795-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 003527795-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Opolo Tech CO., LTD

China (CN)

Room 501, Building 7, Dong Bian Industry Park, Min Qiang Community, Min Zhi Office, Longhua New District, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China

Holder · RCD owner

Chris Arathoon

United Kingdom (GB)

Unit 8 Severnside Trading Estate, Textilose Road, Trafford Park, Manchester, M17 1WA, United Kingdom

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1

AGM Cinematic Light Up Box A4 Size Warm Light with Black Letters, Numbers, Symbols

ASIN B01JS758UM · Amazon.co.uk · disclosed 2016-08-05

Web disclosureD2

My Cinema Lightbox lighting display

https://mycinemalightbox.com · Internet Archive / mycinemalightbox.com · disclosed 2015-08-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on two earlier light-box designs disclosed online before the filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations, so the applicant’s factual assertions and evidence were unrebutted.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of D1 and D2, rejected the novelty ground against D1 because the displayed wording differed, but found no different overall impression for individual character.
  • The application was upheld under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6, and the contested RCD was declared invalid without assessing D2 further.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberGaile SAKALAITE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

20.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127918

vs Meng Shen

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000125695

vs Wuhan Yaoanxin Trading Co., Ltd.

2024-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000117833

vs Xuecong Chen

2023-01-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000113161

vs shenzhen kerchan technology co.,ltd

2021-01-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000105860

vs Televic Conference,

2020-12-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000010490

vs ESPURRO BUSINESS s.r.o.

2018-06-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000114002

vs ORGATEX GmbH

2021-11-23Art 25(1)(b)207
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)5