DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004680296-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2020-12-22

000105860

Contested design: 004680296-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0046802960001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Taiden Industrial Co., LTD.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

6/F, Block B, Future Plaza, 6060 Qiaoxiang Rd, Nanshan District, Shenzhen Guangdong 518053, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Taylor Wessing

Holder · RCD owner

Televic Conferencevia PDF extraction

Belgium (BE)

Leo Bekaertlaan 1, 8870 Izegem, Belgium

Represented by

Cape IP Law

Prior art cited (1)

National design

Chinese design patent registration for an electronic conference nameplate

CN 302 798 271 S · Chinese National Intellectual Property Administration · disclosed 2014-04-16

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over several earlier designs, relying in particular on Chinese design CN 302 798 271 S.
  • The holder argued its electronic nameplate had design awards, that designer freedom was limited, and that its thin profile, asymmetric base, light bar, and button created a different overall impression.
  • The Division found the earlier Chinese design had been validly disclosed, considered designer freedom broadly preserved, and treated the claimed differences as minor or partly functional.
  • The contested design reproduced the prior design’s overall impression and was invalidated in full; the holder was ordered to pay costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit CESSY FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

20.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127918

vs Meng Shen

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000125695

vs Wuhan Yaoanxin Trading Co., Ltd.

2024-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000117833

vs Xuecong Chen

2023-01-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000113161

vs shenzhen kerchan technology co.,ltd

2021-01-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000011187

vs Chris Arathoon

2018-07-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000010490

vs ESPURRO BUSINESS s.r.o.

2018-06-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000114002

vs ORGATEX GmbH

2021-11-23Art 25(1)(b)207
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)5