DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007974357-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-01-30

000117833

Contested design: 007974357-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 007974357-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Ningxy, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Calle de Piedrafita, 1, 28947 Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain

Represented by

Baylos

Holder · RCD owner

Xuecong Chen

China (CN)

Block 44, Section B, Tanglan Industry, No.123, Xinyi 4th Road, Nanshan District, Shenzhen, China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureExhibit 3

Litthing bottle water dispenser / electric drinking water pump

https://amazon.de (ASIN B07WYYGNGG) · Amazon.de · disclosed 2019-08-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, relying on earlier water-dispenser designs disclosed online, especially an Amazon listing dated 31 August 2019.
  • The holder disputed disclosure, arguing the evidence did not prove publication date, territory, prior sales, or identity between the designs.
  • The Division held the Amazon.de listing had sufficient probative value to establish public disclosure before the filing date under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • It found only immaterial differences between the designs, concluded the contested design lacked novelty, and invalidated it in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

20.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000127918

vs Meng Shen

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000125695

vs Wuhan Yaoanxin Trading Co., Ltd.

2024-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000113161

vs shenzhen kerchan technology co.,ltd

2021-01-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000105860

vs Televic Conference,

2020-12-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000011187

vs Chris Arathoon

2018-07-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000010490

vs ESPURRO BUSINESS s.r.o.

2018-06-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000114002

vs ORGATEX GmbH

2021-11-23Art 25(1)(b)207
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)5