DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015072732-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-10-07

000127918

Contested design: 015072732-0002

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered EU design No 015072732-0002 is declared invalid. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Dongguan Kaiwei Electronic Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Dongguan City, Guangdong Province, China

Holder · RCD owner

Meng Shen

Poland (PL)

Katowice, Poland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

bottle water dispenser; smart quantitative liquor dispenser; pump pourer; whiskey aerator; automatic electric wine decanter

https://www.alibaba.com · Alibaba · disclosed 2023-12-07

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested beverage-dispenser design lacked novelty and individual character in light of earlier third-party designs disclosed and used in trade before the filing date.
  • The applicant relied on an Alibaba product listing with customer reviews dated 7 December 2023; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted the Alibaba printout as sufficient internet disclosure under Article 7(1) and found the earlier and contested designs overwhelmingly similar in overall impression.
  • Given at least average designer freedom, any possible unseen differences were insufficient; the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b).
  • The invalidity application was upheld in full, the design was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

20.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000125695

vs Wuhan Yaoanxin Trading Co., Ltd.

2024-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000117833

vs Xuecong Chen

2023-01-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000113161

vs shenzhen kerchan technology co.,ltd

2021-01-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000105860

vs Televic Conference,

2020-12-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000011187

vs Chris Arathoon

2018-07-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000010490

vs ESPURRO BUSINESS s.r.o.

2018-06-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)208
000114002

vs ORGATEX GmbH

2021-11-23Art 25(1)(b)207
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)5