DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002565820-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-05-11

000009968

Contested design: 002565820-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità del disegno/modello comunitario registrato n. 0025658200001 è respinta. 2. La richiedente sopporta l’onere delle spese sostenute dal titolare, fissate in 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Société des Automobiles Alpine Renault (Société anonyme)

France (FR)

Avenue de Breaute, 76200 Dieppe Cedex, Francia

Represented by

Cabinet Escande

Holder · RCD owner

Filippo Gemellivia PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Tiziano 17, 10100 Torino, Italia

Represented by

Apra’ Brevetti

Prior art cited (1)

Prior useD1

Alpine A110 automobile

Alpine A110 / FIA homologation sheet no. 585 · FIA international sporting code homologation request and sheet no. 585 · disclosed 1967-11-15

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(f)Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity based on copyright, novelty, and individual character, arguing the contested car design reproduced the earlier Alpine A110 disclosed in 1967.
  • The holder denied that Alpine A110 qualified for copyright protection and argued the contested RCD differed in its features and overall impression.
  • The Division accepted that Alpine A110 was copyright-protected under French law and that D1 had been disclosed before the filing date.
  • The Division found no unauthorized use of the copyrighted work, no identity with D1, and a different overall impression, so the invalidity grounds failed.
  • The invalidity application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to reimburse the holder's representation costs of EUR 400.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberPierluigi M. VILLANI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

12.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000104359

vs Lohia e-mobility GmbH

2020-06-23Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(f)1210
000113981

vs Hangzhou Chic Intelligent Technology Co., Ltd

2022-04-08Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)128
000107759

vs A & F S.r.l.

2020-06-10Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)128
000107760

vs A & F S.r.l.

2020-06-04Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)128
000103799

vs LT Fördertechnik

2019-11-04Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)128
000102599

vs Tecnimoem Care, S.L.

2019-10-10Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)128
000103619

vs Airwheel Europe S. A.

2019-09-17Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)128
000011186

vs LA MARE Spółka z o.o.

2019-08-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)128