DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003119585-0036

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-05-24

000010371

Contested design: 003119585-0036

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity against registered Community design No 0031195850036 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità del disegno/modello comunitario registrato n. 0031195850036 è respinta. 2. La richiedente sopporta l’onere delle spese sostenute dalla titolare, fissate in 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

B 4 LIVING S.r.l.

Italy (IT)

Via Direttissima del Conero n. 51, 60021 Camerano (AN), Italia

Holder · RCD owner

CALLIGARIS S.p.a.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Trieste n. 12, 33044 Manzano (UD), Italia

Represented by

GLP S.r.l.

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDD1

tables

000839717-0002 · Bollettino dei disegni comunitari · disclosed 2008-01-14

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, relying on earlier Community design D1 for tables and arguing both designs shared the same distinctive crossed curved legs.
  • The holder argued the contested design was new and had individual character because its tabletop, leg thickness, curvature, asymmetry, and overall aesthetic differed clearly from D1.
  • The Division accepted D1 as a valid prior disclosure and assessed the informed user, designer freedom, and the overall impressions created by the competing table designs.
  • It found the common circular tabletop was not distinctive and that the support structures differed sufficiently in thickness, curvature, asymmetry, and connection to the top to create a different overall impression.
  • The invalidity application was therefore rejected and the applicant was ordered to reimburse the holder's representation costs of EUR 400.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberPierluigi M. VILLANI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000107779

vs ANJI WEIYU FURNITURE CO., LTD.

2020-04-03Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000105800

vs Next Retail Limited

2020-04-02Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000108302

vs INTER LINK SAS

2020-01-20Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000101539

vs Soma Group d.o.o.

2019-07-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000101480

vs Soma Group d.o.o.

2019-07-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000101520

vs Soma Group d.o.o.

2019-07-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000102339

vs Syzan Sp. z o.o.

2019-04-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000102859

vs Syzan Sp. z o.o.

2019-04-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068