DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004003879-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-06-05

000010846

Contested design: 004003879-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld; the registered Community design No 004003879-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

Se estima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad. Se declara nulo el dibujo o modelo comunitario registrado nº 004003879-0001. Se condena al titular a que sufrague las costas del solicitante, que se fijan en 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Fatboy the Original B.V.

Netherlands (NL)

De Steenbok 19-21, 5215 MG ’s-Hertogenbosch, Países Bajos

Holder · RCD owner

EUROSILLA, S.A.

Spain (ES)

Calle de l’or, 28, 08290 Cerdanyola del Vallés (Barcelona), España

Prior art cited (2)

Registered RCD

tumbona inflable formada por dos tubos oblongos

RCD No 002621904-0001 · Boletín de Dibujos y Modelos Comunitarios · disclosed 2015-02-03

Web disclosure

extractos de Internet que muestran y explican el producto en varios sitios web

varios sitios web

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over its earlier air-filled lounger design with two oblong tubes and an opening at one end.
  • The applicant argued the contested design created the same overall impression and that designer freedom was broad for this type of inflatable lounge product.
  • The holder filed no observations and is described only as the registered design holder in the decision.
  • The Division found the earlier RCD had been properly disclosed and that the contested design's shape matched it, with only an insignificant side label differing.
  • The invalidity application was upheld on Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 5, so the Division did not examine the Article 6 ground.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELISOVA
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.09

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068