DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002733949-0020

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-06-13

000010474

Contested design: 002733949-0020

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0027339490020 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Remalux B.V.

Netherlands (NL)

Netwerk No 140-142, 1446 Purmerend, Netherlands

Represented by

Busse & Partner

Holder · RCD owner

Honglan Yinvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Yuquan East Road No. 2, Quanxi Town, 421000 Hengnan County, Hunan Province, People's Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex 1

LED light bulb

YouTube video screenshots published on 03/04/2014 · YouTube · disclosed 2014-04-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier online disclosures of an LED light bulb before 9 July 2015.
  • The holder disputed disclosure, arguing YouTube publication dates, Amazon availability dates, and several annexes were unreliable or too unclear to prove the earlier design.
  • The Division held internet disclosures can establish prior art, accepted the YouTube and corroborating evidence as reliable, and found the prior design had been made available to the public.
  • Comparing the designs directly, the Division found them identical in all relevant features, so the RCD lacked novelty and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268