DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004241776-0015

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-06-15

000011125

Contested design: 004241776-0015

CDR

Outcome

Application inadmissible

The invalidity application is rejected as inadmissible, and the invalidity fee will not be refunded.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected as inadmissible. 2. The fee for the application for a declaration of invalidity will not be refunded.

CostsNot specified

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

UAB Simply System

LT

Oslo g. 1, 04123 Vilnius, Lithuania

Represented by

Linas Songaila

Holder · RCD owner

UAB ‘Stumdomos sistemos’via PDF extraction

LT

Ukmergės g. 369A, 12142 Vilnius, Lithuania

Represented by

Law firm IP FORMA

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 28(1)(b)(v)Article 28(1)(b)(vi)Article 30(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity of RCD No 004241776-0015 under Article 25(1)(b) CDR.
  • Holder filed no observations; the application was examined for formal admissibility.
  • The Division found the application failed to identify the relevant prior design and lacked supporting facts and arguments.
  • Because the applicant did not remedy the deficiencies within the set time limit, the application was rejected as inadmissible and the fee was not refunded.

Deciding panel

  • MemberKatarina Čavor
  • MemberLudmila Čelišová
  • MemberBirgit Filtenborg

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000105879

vs Bernhard Hirsch

2020-02-04Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)258
000104699

vs DACHPOL Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością

2020-01-30Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)258
000104060

vs SUZHOU 3DS ENGINEERING PROCUREMENT CONSTRUCTION CO., Ltd.

2019-12-12Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)258
000104079

vs SUZHOU 3DS ENGINEERING PROCUREMENT CONSTRUCTION CO., Ltd.

2019-12-12Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)258
000104059

vs SUZHOU 3DS ENGINEERING PROCUREMENT CONSTRUCTION CO., Ltd.

2019-12-12Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)258
000106301

vs Sports Partner

2019-09-27Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)258
000106281

vs Sports Partner

2019-09-27Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)258
000106280

vs Sports Partner

2019-09-27Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)258