DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004042679-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-06-26

000010828

Contested design: 004042679-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application against registered Community design No 004042679-0001 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 004042679-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Fatboy the Original B.V.

Netherlands (NL)

De Steenbok 19-21, 5215 MG ‘s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands

Holder · RCD owner

Zhigang WANG

China (CN)

Sihai dormitory she kou Nanshan district, Shenzhen (Guangdong province) 518000, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

LAMZAC inflatable lounger / chaise longue

RCD No 002621904-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2015-02-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over its earlier LAMZAC design, arguing both loungers shared the same long double-tube form, central slit and rolled opening concept.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division found the prior design had no elevated backrest and used a different closure mechanism, so the designs were not identical for Article 5 purposes.
  • Despite broad design freedom, those structural differences in the headrest, ends and closure produced a different overall impression on the informed user, so the contested design retained individual character.
  • The invalidity application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder's fixed representation costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000107779

vs ANJI WEIYU FURNITURE CO., LTD.

2020-04-03Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000105800

vs Next Retail Limited

2020-04-02Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000108302

vs INTER LINK SAS

2020-01-20Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000101539

vs Soma Group d.o.o.

2019-07-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000101480

vs Soma Group d.o.o.

2019-07-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000101520

vs Soma Group d.o.o.

2019-07-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000102339

vs Syzan Sp. z o.o.

2019-04-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000102859

vs Syzan Sp. z o.o.

2019-04-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068