DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002538140-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-06-28

000010549

Contested design: 002538140-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 002538140-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Eternit Österreich GmbH

Austria (AT)

Eternitstraße 34, 4840 Vöcklabruck, Austria

Holder · RCD owner

ETERNIT N.V.

Belgium (BE)

Kuiermansstraat 1, 1880 Kapelle-op-den-Bos, Belgium

Represented by

Etex Services NV

Silvia Cartois

Prior art cited (3)

Publication

Earlier Eternit facade/building panel design shown in German brochures and planning papers.

Eternit brochure and planning papers

PublicationD1

RIEDER noise-reducing building panel design shown on page 39 of the Lärmschutz brochure.

RIEDER / www.rieder.at / web.archive.org · disclosed 2013-03-04

Registered RCD

Earlier registered Community design for a similar building panel.

RCD No 002310201-0001 · EUIPO register

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, and also argued the design was solely dictated by technical function.
  • The holder said Equitone Linea had distinct proportions and a visible woolly fibrous texture, so the earlier designs did not create the same overall impression.
  • The Division rejected the Article 8(1) objection because the applicant did not prove that technical function alone dictated the panel’s appearance.
  • The Division accepted D1 as disclosed by 4 March 2013 and found the visible surface pattern created the same overall impression, so the RCD lacked individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258