DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003864669-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-07-05

000010826

Contested design: 003864669-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 003864669-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shen Zhen Victor Solar Technology Co., Ltd

China (CN)

Songgang Street, Baoan District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province, People’s Republic of China

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Bai Si Wei Solar Energy Co. Limited

China (CN)

10F, Building 18, Wuliandui Industrial Zone B, Shangcun Community, Gongming Town, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Guluman Outdoor Solar Fairy LED String Lights 200 LED 72ft 8 Modes

ASIN B06Y5M8SPM · Amazon.co.uk · disclosed 2016-09-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, arguing that an identical solar light design had been disclosed before the RCD filing date.
  • The applicant relied on Amazon.co.uk printouts for the Guluman solar string lights first offered on 06/09/2016; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon evidence as sufficient disclosure under Article 7 CDR and found no rebuttal from the holder.
  • The contested design was identical to the earlier disclosed design apart from immaterial text on the reverse, so it lacked novelty under Article 5 CDR.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid in full, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268