DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003410620-0021

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-07-13

000010773

Contested design: 003410620-0021

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's fixed costs of EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 003410620-0021 is rejected. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Classiribalta Lda

Portugal (PT)

Rua da Via Panorâmica nº1612, 4595-076 Paços de Ferreira, Portugal

Holder · RCD owner

M.G. Fernandes — Indústria de Estofos, Ldavia PDF extraction

Portugal (PT)

Rua de São Pedro, nº 153, 4580-865 Lordelo PRD, Portugal

Prior art cited (1)

Prior useAnnex 1

'OMEGA' sofa shown in the 'Suffa design' catalogue and in 2013-2014 order confirmations

order confirmations issued by the holder to French companies; catalogue 'Suffa design' · disclosed 2013-09-20

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested sofa-armrest design lacked novelty because the holder had already marketed the same 'OMEGA' sofa since at least 2013.
  • The applicant relied on an undated 'Suffa design' catalogue, 2013-2014 order confirmations, and one untranslated French document; the holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division accepted that the earlier 'OMEGA' sofa had been disclosed to the public through business documents and the catalogue before the filing date.
  • The Division found the differing light and dark material arrangement on the armrest was not an immaterial detail, so the designs were not identical and novelty was preserved.
  • The invalidity application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to bear the holder's fixed representation costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000107779

vs ANJI WEIYU FURNITURE CO., LTD.

2020-04-03Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000105800

vs Next Retail Limited

2020-04-02Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000108302

vs INTER LINK SAS

2020-01-20Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000101539

vs Soma Group d.o.o.

2019-07-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000101480

vs Soma Group d.o.o.

2019-07-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000101520

vs Soma Group d.o.o.

2019-07-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000102339

vs Syzan Sp. z o.o.

2019-04-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000102859

vs Syzan Sp. z o.o.

2019-04-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068