DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003451160-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-07-18

000010600

Contested design: 003451160-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 003451160-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Fatboy the Original B.V.

Netherlands (NL)

De Steenbok 19-21, 5215 MG ’s-Hertogenbosch, Netherlands

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Dasiney Sleep Technology Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Floor 5, No. 188, Longhu Road, Longdong Community, Longgang Street, Longgang District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province 518000, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Jannig & Repkow

Prior art cited (2)

Registered RCD

earlier 'LAMZAC' inflatable lounger / chaise longue

RCD No 002621904-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2015-02-03

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

internet extracts depicting the applicant’s 'LAMZAC' design on various websites

various websites

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 6(1)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over its earlier 'LAMZAC' RCD and related internet materials.
  • Holder argued the contested inflatable sofa had materially different shape, structure, pillow-like short part, stability features and overall impression.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier RCD publication but refused to rely on the internet extracts as insufficiently reliable evidence.
  • It found the designs not identical and producing different overall impressions, so the invalidity ground under Article 25(1)(b) failed and the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000107779

vs ANJI WEIYU FURNITURE CO., LTD.

2020-04-03Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000105800

vs Next Retail Limited

2020-04-02Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000108302

vs INTER LINK SAS

2020-01-20Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000101539

vs Soma Group d.o.o.

2019-07-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000101480

vs Soma Group d.o.o.

2019-07-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000101520

vs Soma Group d.o.o.

2019-07-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000102339

vs Syzan Sp. z o.o.

2019-04-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068
000102859

vs Syzan Sp. z o.o.

2019-04-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)068