DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003506625-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-07-26

000010856

Contested design: 003506625-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 003506625-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Ledil Oy

Finland (FI)

Joensuunkatu 13, 24100 Salo, Finland

Holder · RCD owner

Zhongshan Darkoo optical Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

BeiKa Warehouse, HuanMao LuCe, HuoJu Development Zone, Zhongshan, People's Republic of China

Represented by

Global IP Law Ltd.

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

optic module for street lighting

CS14632_STRADA-2X2MXDWC · Ledil website / Internet Archive · disclosed 2015-04-16

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on earlier public disclosure of its CS14632_STRADA-2X2MXDWC street-lighting optic module.
  • Holder filed no observations and did not rebut the applicant's evidence on disclosure or the design comparison.
  • The Division accepted the website, catalogue, press-release, and Internet Archive evidence as proving prior disclosure before the RCD filing date.
  • It found the designs created the same overall impression on the informed user; the material difference was noticeable but insufficient to confer individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268