DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002576215-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-08-30

000010891

Contested design: 002576215-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0025762150001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant's costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Delta-Sport Handelskontor GmbH

Germany (DE)

Wragekamp 6, 22397 Hamburg, Germany

Represented by

Blaum Dettmers Rabstein

Mario Krogmann

Holder · RCD owner

TCC Global N.V.

Netherlands (NL)

World Trade Centre, Zuidplein 84, 1077XV Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Represented by

Kilburn & Strode Llp

Prior art cited (3)

Publication

news article showing plush toys in the forms of vegetables and fruit used in Conad loyalty programme

The Goodness Gang takes Italy by Storm · the grocery trader · disclosed 2012-03-01

Web disclosure

screenshot from commercial showing the earlier aubergine plush toy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzXJ89SryE8 · YouTube · disclosed 2012-11-12

Web disclosure

screenshots from video reporting on Unicoop Florence promotion campaign showing the earlier aubergine plush toy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkwGDtb7TVc · YouTube · disclosed 2013-10-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, relying on earlier disclosures of an aubergine-shaped plush toy from an online article and YouTube materials predating the contested RCD.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not rebut the applicant's facts or evidence.
  • The Division found the submitted materials credibly disclosed the earlier plush toy before the filing date under Article 7 CDR and considered the compared designs identical apart from immaterial details.
  • The application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid for lack of novelty, and the holder was ordered to bear costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218