DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009011992-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-04-29

000129622

Contested design: 009011992-0002

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 009011992-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Robitsvia PDF extraction

Belgium (BE)

Kortrijk, Belgium

Represented by

De Clercq & Partners

Holder · RCD owner

Squar3D Aps

Denmark (DK)

Hadsten, Denmark

Represented by

Niels Uth

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureAnnexes 2 and 3

‘TOY^2 Track Connectors Review’ article showing the female-female straight ahead block

https://legebyen.dk · legebyen.dk · disclosed 2021-03-10

Web disclosureAnnex 4

Wayback Machine capture of the holder’s Toy^2 Track Connectors website

https://squar3d.dk · Wayback Machine · disclosed 2020-11-18

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)Article 8(1)Article 8(2)Article 8(3)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the connector’s features were dictated by technical function and mechanical interconnection and that earlier online disclosures also destroyed novelty and individual character.
  • Holder said the contested design differed visually from earlier connectors, reflected aesthetic choices, and benefited from remaining design freedom despite interoperability constraints.
  • The Division treated the product as part of a modular system, so Article 8(3) could preserve protection if novelty and individual character were met.
  • It found the prior 10/03/2021 online design produced the same overall impression on the informed user, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130710

vs Tao Zhu

2026-01-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218