DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 009021397-0007

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-02-03

000130128

Contested design: 009021397-0007

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is granted, the registered EU design No 009021397-0007 is declared invalid, and the holder must pay costs fixed at EUR 720.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene EU-Geschmacksmuster Nr. 009021397-0007 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf EUR 720 festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Besonderes4Kids GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Dettingen an der Erms, Deutschland

Holder · RCD owner

joboo GmbH

Germany (DE)

Jungingen, Deutschland

Prior art cited (4)

Registered RCDD1

older registered EU design cited against the contested design

004386324-0001 · EUIPO Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2017-10-05

Registered RCD

another registered EU design cited by the applicant but not further assessed for reasons of procedural economy

Publication

newspaper article cited by the applicant but not further assessed for reasons of procedural economy

Publication

newspaper article cited by the applicant but not further assessed for reasons of procedural economy

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying primarily on earlier registered EU design D1 and additionally on another EU design and two newspaper articles.
  • The holder was invited to respond but filed no observations in the invalidity proceedings.
  • The Invalidity Division held that D1 had been validly disclosed before 11 May 2022 and that the contested design created the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld on Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6(1)(b); the Division did not need to examine novelty separately.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberWolfgang SCHRAMEK
  • MemberThorsten ICKENROTH

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.0121.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130710

vs Tao Zhu

2026-01-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218