DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002576215-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-08-30

000011021

Contested design: 002576215-0005

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and Registered Community design No 0025762150005 is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0025762150005 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Delta-Sport Handelskontor GmbH

Germany (DE)

Wragekamp 6, 22397 Hamburg, Germany

Represented by

Blaum Dettmers, Rabstein

Mario Krogmann

Holder · RCD owner

TCC Global N.V.

Netherlands (NL)

World Trade Centre, Zuidplein 84, 1077XV Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Represented by

Kilburn & Strode Llp

Prior art cited (3)

Publication

online article showing a plush toy in the shape of a garlic used in Conad's loyalty programme

The Goodness Gang takes Italy by Storm · the grocery trader · disclosed 2012-03-01

Web disclosure

screenshot from a commercial showing the earlier garlic-shaped plush toy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzXJ89SryE8 · YouTube · disclosed 2012-11-12

Web disclosure

screenshots from a video about Unicoop's Florence promotion campaign showing the earlier garlic-shaped plush toy

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkwGDtb7TVc · YouTube

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and relied on an online article and YouTube materials showing an earlier garlic-shaped plush toy before the contested filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations or rebuttal evidence.
  • The Division found the submitted materials credible and sufficient to prove public disclosure of the earlier plush-toy design by 1 March 2012 under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • Comparing the common visible features, the Division held the contested design identical to the prior design and declared the RCD invalid, with costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218