DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002576215-0007

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-08-30

000011023

Contested design: 002576215-0007

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0025762150007 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Delta-Sport Handelskontor GmbH

Germany (DE)

Wragekamp 6, 22397 Hamburg, Germany

Represented by

Blaum Dettmers, Rabstein

Mario Krogmann

Holder · RCD owner

TCC Global N.V.

Netherlands (NL)

World Trade Centre, Zuidplein 84, 1077XV Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Represented by

Kilburn & Strode Llp

Prior art cited (3)

Publication

Online news article showing plush toys shaped as vegetables and fruit in Conad's loyalty program.

The Goodness Gang takes Italy by Storm · the grocery trader · disclosed 2012-03-01

Web disclosure

Commercial screenshot showing a plush toy fruit or vegetable character.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EzXJ89SryE8 · YouTube · disclosed 2012-11-12

Web disclosure

Video screenshots reporting on Unicoop's Florence promotion campaign featuring plush toy fruit characters.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkwGDtb7TVc · YouTube · disclosed 2013-10-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty under Article 25(1)(b) with Articles 4 and 5, relying on 2012 and 2013 online disclosures of a strawberry-shaped plush toy.
  • The holder filed no observations or rebuttal evidence.
  • The Division found the submitted article and video evidence sufficient to prove prior public disclosure under Article 7(1), especially as the holder offered nothing to the contrary.
  • It concluded the contested design was identical to the prior plush toy, upheld the application, invalidated the RCD, and awarded EUR 750 in costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218