DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003813518-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-09-07

000010814

Contested design: 003813518-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 350.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 003813518-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 350.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Songmics Internlational GmbH

Germany (DE)

Grünenplatzstr.16-18, 42899 Remscheid, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Aukey E-Business Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 102, Building 9, Huanan Avenue No.1 Huanan City, International Printing Paper Packaging Logistics Zone (a), Pinghu Town, Longgand District, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

José Izquierdo Faces

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosure

garment rack, model HSR01B

ASIN B00YTMX1XI · amazon.co.uk · disclosed 2015-06-04

Web disclosure

HOMFA garment rack

disclosed 2017-02-02

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested garment-rack design lacked novelty and individual character because an earlier garment rack had been publicly offered online before the filing date.
  • Applicant relied mainly on Amazon printouts for model HSR01B first available on 4 June 2015, and also cited another similar HOMFA rack.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier Amazon design, found novelty survived because the decorative top differed, but held those differences did not alter the overall impression.
  • Because the designer had broad freedom and the overall impression remained the same, the RCD lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068