DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003813518-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-09-07

000010815

Contested design: 003813518-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 350.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 003813518-0003 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant's costs, fixed at EUR 350.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Songmics Internlational GmbH

Germany (DE)

Grünenplatzstr.16-18, 42899 Remscheid, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Aukey E-Business Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 102, Building 9, Huanan Avenue No.1 Huanan city, International Printing Paper Packaging Logistics Zone (a), Pinghu Town, Longgand District, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

José Izquierdo Faces

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosure

garment rack

http://www.amazon.co.uk / ASIN B01DSXA0JQ / model HSR04B · Amazon.co.uk · disclosed 2016-04-06

Web disclosure

identical garment rack

www.Amazon.de · Amazon.de · disclosed 2016-01-22

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier online disclosures of a garment rack sold on Amazon before the RCD filing date.
  • The applicant argued the prior and contested designs were overall identical and produced no different overall impression on the informed user.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon.co.uk listing as sufficient proof of disclosure under Article 7 and found the only hook-colour difference immaterial.
  • The application was upheld because the contested RCD lacked novelty, so the Division did not examine individual character or the other cited design.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068