DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004068112-0018

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-09-10

000010899

Contested design: 004068112-0018

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 004068112-0018 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Semir Raad Maroki

Romania (RO)

str. Faurei nr. 5, bloc C9, sc. C, ap. 82, Bucharest, Romania

Represented by

Frisch & Partners Srl

Crina Frisch

Holder · RCD owner

SC Gold Glass SRLvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Str. Lt. Col. Dumitru Papazoglu, nr. 60, Et. 2, Ap. 10, Sector 3 031203 Bucharest, Romania

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

transparent glassware / drinking glass with butterfly or flower-like decoration

RCD No 003850601-0007 · Office bulletin · disclosed 2017-04-24

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier RCD No 003850601-0007.
  • The holder argued the applicant had sold similar glass products for years, should not obtain a monopoly over a glass mug, and that the earlier cited design should itself be invalidated.
  • The Division found the earlier RCD had been disclosed by publication before the contested filing date and that the compared designs were identical in shape and decoration.
  • The application was upheld on Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 5, so the Division did not need to examine individual character further.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131546

vs Foshan Changyuansheng Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078