DesignVerdict
← Back to search
Contested design 015093325-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-06-11

000131250

Contested design: 015093325-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and registered EU design No 015093325-0001 is declared invalid; the holder bears the costs fixed at EUR 720.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015093325-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shutao Zhanvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Xinyang, Henan, China

Represented by

Metida

Holder · RCD owner

Futing Liuvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Lianjiang City, Guangdong Province, China

Represented by

Mon Yin Lin

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

lint remover — handheld device with circular head comprising perforated central surface and aligned elongated handle

EU design registration No 015048906-0001 · EU Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2024-01-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant (Shutao Zhan) argued that the contested lint remover design lacks individual character compared to earlier EU design registration No 015048906-0001 (published 31/01/2024), with unlimited designer freedom as shape and arrangement of features are not technically constrained.
  • Holder argued the designs differ in five specific respects: a discontinuous ring on the front surface, elliptical button surround, absence of a stepped shaving head, visible charging port position, and bottom-view handle overlap — collectively creating a different overall impression.
  • The Division found the designs almost identical in shape, proportions, configuration and colours; both have a circular head with perforated surface on an elongated handle with a sliding button; the holder's enumerated differences would require detailed examination beyond overall-impression assessment.
  • Application upheld; contested design declared invalid for lack of individual character under Article 6(1)(b) EUDR.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130021

vs ΛΑΡΙΠΛΑΣΤ ΑΕΒΕ

2026-06-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078