DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to representatives

Applicant-side representative

Metida

44 first-instance invalidity cases · 20212026 · 97.7% win rate

Cases

44

Invalidated

43

Lost

1

Win rate

97.7%

Median costs

€750

Win rate by year

2021
100%1/1 merits
2022
100%4/4 merits
2023
100%5/5 merits
2024
90.9%10/11 merits
2025
100%22/22 merits
2026
100%1/1 merits

Bar = win rate; faint right-hand bar = case volume that year.

Most-practised sectors

  • 14Recording, telecom & data processing11
  • 06Furnishing5
  • 07Household goods5
  • 08Tools & hardware5
  • 26Lighting apparatus5
  • 21Games, toys, tents & sports4

Most-invoked grounds

  • Article 25(1)(b)43
  • Article 6(1)(b)33
  • Article 4(1)29
  • Article 7(1)26
  • Article 713
  • Article 6(2)6

Most-represented clients

Most-frequent opposing parties

Most-frequent opposing holder-side firms

Recent decisions

DateCaseHolderOutcome
2026-04-17000130924Sohai Housewares Ho., Ltd.Invalidated (total)
2025-12-23000129861Liu yanqiongInvalidated (total)
2025-12-18000129842Li LiuInvalidated (total)
2025-12-15000129805Liu yanqiongInvalidated (total)
2025-12-15000129843Liu yanqiongInvalidated (total)
2025-11-13000129806Suzhou Bimeng Technology Co., Ltd.Invalidated (total)
2025-11-07000129703Jie HuangInvalidated (total)
2025-11-04000129824Suzhou Bimon Technology Co., LTDInvalidated (total)
2025-10-28000129601Xiaolin PengInvalidated (total)
2025-08-29000129095Yingbo LuoInvalidated (total)
2025-07-14000128415Huilin ChenInvalidated (total)
2025-07-14000128395Huilin ChenInvalidated (total)