DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003852672-0013

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-09-11

000010755

Contested design: 003852672-0013

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0038526720013 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

David Kipping

Germany (DE)

Agrippinawerft 24, 50678 Cologne, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Chrome Cherry Design Studio (PTY) Ltdvia PDF extraction

ZA

Unit 304, Salt Circle Arcade, 19 Kent Street, Salt River, 7925 Cape Town, South Africa

Prior art cited (2)

Prior useD1

classic Lego plate

Web disclosureD2

silicone briks and straps 222 piece flexible building bricks

ASIN B01LZWR2PL · Amazon.com · disclosed 2016-10-20

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for technical functionality and, alternatively, lack of novelty or individual character over earlier Lego-compatible designs, especially D2 disclosed online before filing.
  • The holder disputed proper disclosure of the prior designs, denied that the features were purely functional, and argued that the contested design created a different overall impression.
  • The Division accepted Enclosure A10 as valid internet disclosure of D2 before the filing date, but found D2 not identical to the contested RCD, so novelty was not destroyed.
  • The Division held that the differences in arrangement, colour, and length did not alter the overall impression on the informed user, so the contested RCD lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberPierluigi M. VILLANI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218