DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003852672-0016

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-09-11

000010756

Contested design: 003852672-0016

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0038526720016 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

David Kipping

Germany (DE)

Agrippinawerft 24, 50678 Cologne, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Chrome Cherry Design Studio (PTY) Ltdvia PDF extraction

ZA

Unit 304, Salt Circle Arcade, 19 Kent Street, Salt River, 7925 Cape Town, South Africa

Prior art cited (2)

OtherD1

classic Lego plate

Web disclosureD2

Lego-compatible silicone straps

www.facebook.com/strictlybricks · www.facebook.com/strictlybricks

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the flexible studded tape was purely functional and, in any event, lacked novelty or individual character over the classic Lego plate and Strictly Briks straps.
  • The holder argued that the earlier straps were not properly disclosed, the RCD's dimensions and underside were not purely functional, and the contested design created a different overall impression.
  • The Division accepted D2 from the Strictly Briks Facebook page as prior disclosure, found novelty remained because D2 was not identical, but held the differences too minor to change the overall impression.
  • The application was upheld because the RCD lacked individual character under Article 6, so Article 8(1) was not examined further and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberPierluigi M. VILLANI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218