DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003852672-0024

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-09-18

000010758

Contested design: 003852672-0024

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0038526720024 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

David Kipping

Germany (DE)

Agrippinawerft 24, 50678 Cologne, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Chrome Cherry Design Studio (PTY) Ltdvia PDF extraction

ZA

Unit 304, Salt Circle Arcade, 19 Kent Street, Salt River, 7925 Cape Town, South Africa

Prior art cited (2)

OtherD1

classic Lego plate

Web disclosureD2

Lego-compatible silicone straps with two lines of studs

www.facebook.com/strictlybricks · Facebook · disclosed 2016-06-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5(1)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the flexible studded tape design was purely technical and, in any event, lacked novelty or individual character over the classic Lego plate and earlier Strictly Briks straps.
  • Holder contested disclosure of the earlier straps, denied that the features were purely functional, and argued visible differences in studs, underside, colours, and length changed the overall impression.
  • The Division accepted the Facebook Strictly Briks disclosure dated 03/06/2016 as prior design D2, but found D2 did not destroy novelty because the designs were not identical in all essential features.
  • Despite those differences, the Division held the contested RCD produced the same overall impression as D2 for the informed user and lacked individual character, so the application was upheld and the RCD invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberPierluigi M. VILLANI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218