DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004068112-0008

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-09-24

000010973

Contested design: 004068112-0008

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 004068112-0008 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Semir Raad Maroki

Romania (RO)

str. Faurei nr. 5, bloc C9, sc. C, ap. 82, Bucharest, Romania

Represented by

Frisch & Partners Srl

Crina Frisch

Holder · RCD owner

SC Gold Glass SRLvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Str. Lt. Col. Dumitru Papazoglu, Nr. 60, Et. 2, Ap. 10, Sector 3 031203 Bucharest, Romania

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

transparent glass plate with a floral pattern resembling roses

RCD No 003850601-0028 · EUIPO Office Bulletin · disclosed 2017-04-24

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier RCD No 003850601-0028.
  • The holder argued the product had been marketed for years, monopoly over a glass plate was unjustified, and the earlier design itself lacked novelty and individual character.
  • The Division held the earlier RCD had been validly disclosed through publication before the contested filing date.
  • Comparing the designs directly, the Division found the same plate shape and rose-like decoration, so the contested RCD was identical to the prior design and lacked novelty.
  • The application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay the applicant's fixed costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131546

vs Foshan Changyuansheng Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078