DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004068112-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-09-25

000010915

Contested design: 004068112-0005

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 004068112-0005 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Semir Raad Maroki

Romania (RO)

str. Faurei nr. 5, bloc C9, sc. C, ap. 82, Bucharest, Romania

Represented by

Frisch & Partners Srl

Crina Frisch

Holder · RCD owner

SC Gold Glass SRLvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Str. Lt. Col. Dumitru Papazoglu, Nr. 60, Et. 2, Ap. 10, Sector 3 031203 Bucharest, Romania

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

transparent drinking glass with fish-scale pattern decoration

RCD No 003850601-0015 · Office bulletin · disclosed 2017-04-24

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier RCD No 003850601-0015, published before the contested filing date.
  • The holder argued that the applicant had marketed the product for years, should not obtain a monopoly over a water glass, and that the earlier design itself should be invalidated.
  • The Division held that publication of the earlier RCD in the Office bulletin proved disclosure and that the compared glasses were identical in shape and fish-scale decoration.
  • The application was upheld on lack of novelty under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 5, so Article 6 did not need further examination.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131546

vs Foshan Changyuansheng Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078