DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004068112-0023

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-09-25

000010972

Contested design: 004068112-0023

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 004068112-0023 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Semir Raad Maroki

Romania (RO)

str. Faurei nr. 5, bloc C9, sc. C, ap. 82, Bucharest, Romania

Represented by

Frisch & Partners Srl

Crina Frisch

Holder · RCD owner

SC Gold Glass SRLvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Str. Lt. Col. Dumitru Papazoglu, Nr. 60, Et. 2, Ap. 10, Sector 3 031203 Bucharest, Romania

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

transparent glass bowl with decoration on the bottom and sides

RCD No 003850601-0002 · Office bulletin · disclosed 2017-04-24

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier RCD No 003850601-0002.
  • Holder argued the applicant had marketed similar glass bowls for years and contended the earlier design itself lacked novelty and individual character.
  • The Division treated the earlier RCD's prior publication as a valid disclosure under Article 7 CDR.
  • It found the compared glass bowl designs identical, so the contested RCD lacked novelty under Article 5 CDR.
  • The application was upheld, the contested RCD was invalidated, and the holder was ordered to pay fixed costs of EUR 750.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131546

vs Foshan Changyuansheng Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078