DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003852672-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-09-26

000010809

Contested design: 003852672-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 003852672-0003 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Mediashop GmbH

Austria (AT)

Schwarzottstraße 2a, 2620 Neunkirchen, Austria

Holder · RCD owner

Chrome Cherry Design Studio (Pty) Ltdvia PDF extraction

ZA

Unit 304, Salt Circle Arcade, 19 Kent Street, Salt River, Cape Town 7925, South Africa

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Build Pro toy building-block tape with cylindrical studs arranged in regular rows of two

ASIN B06Y3ZVP2X · Amazon.co.uk · disclosed 2017-04-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying mainly on an earlier Amazon-listed Build Pro tape disclosed before the filing date.
  • The holder disputed disclosure and evidential reliability, argued the cited product copied its earlier Nimuno Loops disclosures within the grace period, and maintained the contested design created a different overall impression.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted the Amazon evidence as sufficient disclosure, rejected the abuse/grace-period argument as unsubstantiated, and found the cited tape clear enough to compare with the contested design.
  • It held that the four-stud tape was only a straightforward variation of the earlier two-stud tape and lacked individual character, so the RCD was invalidated in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218