DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001294664-0010

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-10-30

000010813

Contested design: 001294664-0010

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; the contested Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità è accolta. Il disegno/modello comunitario registrato n. 0012946640010 è dichiarato nullo. La titolare sopporta l’onere delle spese sostenute dalla richiedente, fissate a 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Davide Groppi S.r.l.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Belizzi 22-20 A, 29122 Piacenza, Italia

Holder · RCD owner

Viabizzuno S.r.l.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Romagnoli 10, 40010 Bentivoglio (BO), Italia

Represented by

Bugnion S.p.a.

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDD1

Ares-Vincenza lamp design

01145924-0002 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2009-08-11

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested outdoor lamp lacked novelty and individual character over the earlier Ares-Vincenza design D1 because the stem, cylindrical head and overall proportions were essentially identical.
  • Holder replied that the broad double-layer circular base and related base differences would dominate the informed user's perception and produce a different overall impression.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of D1 from its 11 August 2009 Community design publication, rejected the novelty attack, but found the base, size and colour differences carried limited weight in use.
  • The application was upheld because the contested RCD lacked individual character under Article 6; the holder was ordered to reimburse costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberJessica Norma LEWIS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268