DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003466713-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-11-23

000000022

Contested design: 003466713-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 0034667130001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

MPOW Technology Co., Ltd.

Hong Kong (HK)

Room 603, 6/F, Hang Pont Commercial Building, 31 Tonkin Street, Cheung Sha Wan, KLN, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China

Represented by

MonYin Lin

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Jinghe Technology Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

RM 201, Bldg A, No 1, Qianwan Rd. 1, Qianhai Shengang Cooperation Area, Shenzen City, Guangdong Province 518000, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Zhaoffice SPRL

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosure

solar powered LED lamp design offered and sold by the applicant on Amazon platforms

Amazon listings including ASIN B01JYBXHI2 · Amazon

Other

Excel table showing orders fulfilled in September and October 2016 for the same lamp design

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5(1)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on Amazon listings and sales records showing its solar LED lamp design on the market before the RCD filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not rebut the alleged prior disclosure or the substantive invalidity grounds.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon pages and sales evidence as sufficient proof of public disclosure before filing, rejected the novelty ground, but found the contested design created the same overall impression as the earlier lamp.
  • The application was upheld because the contested RCD lacked individual character and was declared invalid, with costs awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberGailė SAKALAITĖ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268