DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003407196-0007

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-12-03

000011219

Contested design: 003407196-0007

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected and the applicant must bear the holder's costs, fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 003407196-0007 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Tomasz Gawrylczyk

Poland (PL)

Juliusza Słowackiego 32/36 m.5, 01-634 Warszawa, Poland

Represented by

Chmura & Wspόlnicy

Holder · RCD owner

TCC Global N.V.

Netherlands (NL)

World Trade Centre, Zuidplein 84, 1077XV, Amsterdam, Netherlands

Represented by

Kilburn & Strode LLP

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Goodness Gang Felicity Fig Soft Beanie Toy plush toy

ASIN B00M0NRYY0 · Amazon.co.uk · disclosed 2014-07-22

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over an earlier disclosed plush toy sold on Amazon.co.uk from 22 July 2014.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing as sufficient proof of prior disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • Despite shared fruit-toy features, the Division found differences in shape, stem, surface, expression, feet and arm attachment, creating a different overall impression.
  • The application was rejected because the contested RCD retained individual character; the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000109222

vs DELTA-SPORT Handelskontor GmbH

2020-02-12Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)218
000109203

vs DELTA-SPORT Handelskontor GmbH

2020-02-11Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)218
000105502

vs NIKE Innovate C.V.

2019-10-08Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)218
000105761

vs Hui ZENG

2019-09-13Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)218
000104239

vs REPLIC HOCKEY SL

2019-08-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)218
000105219

vs CHROME CHERRY DESIGN STUDIO (PTY) LTD

2019-07-30Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)218
000011052

vs Qizhi Chen

2018-08-28Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)218
000010565

vs Peter Lippert

2018-06-08Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)218