DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003852672-0022

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-07-30

000105219

Contested design: 003852672-0022

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 003852672-0022 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Pearl. GmbH

Germany (DE)

Pearl-Str. 1-3, 79426 Buggingen, Germany

Represented by

Irina Vasilev

Holder · RCD owner

Chrome Cherry Design Studio (Pty) Ltdvia PDF extraction

ZA

Unit 304, Salt Circle Arcade, 19 Kent Street, Salt River, Cape Town 7925, South Africa

Prior art cited (3)

Registered RCDD1⚠ rejected as evidence

design from the same registration as the contested RCD

RCD No 003852672-0011 · EUIPO eSearch database

Web disclosureD2⚠ rejected as evidence

‘Silicone Straps and Connectors Creative Building Kit’ offer by ‘Strictly Briks’

Amazon.co.uk

Registered RCDD3⚠ rejected as evidence

design from the same registration as the contested RCD

RCD No 003852672-0018 · EUIPO eSearch database

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, relying on RCDs D1 and D3 and an alleged earlier Amazon disclosure of identical straps as D2.
  • Holder filed no observations in reply and left the invalidity application undefended on the merits.
  • The Division held D1 and D3 could not serve as prior designs because they shared the contested RCD's filing date.
  • The Amazon printout did not prove any pre-filing disclosure, so Article 7(1) disclosure was not established.
  • The application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000109222

vs DELTA-SPORT Handelskontor GmbH

2020-02-12Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)218
000109203

vs DELTA-SPORT Handelskontor GmbH

2020-02-11Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)218
000105502

vs NIKE Innovate C.V.

2019-10-08Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)218
000105761

vs Hui ZENG

2019-09-13Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)218
000104239

vs REPLIC HOCKEY SL

2019-08-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)218
000011219

vs TCC Global N.V.

2018-12-03Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)218
000011052

vs Qizhi Chen

2018-08-28Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)218
000010565

vs Peter Lippert

2018-06-08Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)218