DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001314777-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-01-28

000011250

Contested design: 001314777-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(fr)

1. La demande en nullité à l'encontre du dessin ou modèle communautaire enregistré nº 0013147770001 est rejetée. 2. La demanderesse supporte les frais exposés par le titulaire, fixés à 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Cristalpack S.r.l.

Italy (IT)

Strada della Mandria 4, 10030 Rondissone, Italie

Represented by

A.BRE.MAR. S.R.L.

Holder · RCD owner

Guy Vanhoutte

Belgium (BE)

Hazenveld 2, 1600 Oudenaken, Belgique

Represented by

GEVERS

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

plastic packaging boxes

RCD No 000954862-0002 · Bulletin des dessins ou modèles communautaires · disclosed 2008-10-29

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(b) CDR, arguing the contested packaging box design lacked novelty and individual character over earlier RCD No 000954862-0002.
  • The holder argued the contested design differed through visible press-stud side elements, a diagonal side closure, a grooved inner wall, outer diagonal tabs, and an inner lining.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted disclosure of the earlier RCD but found the differences were not insignificant, so novelty was preserved.
  • It also found the overall impression on the informed user was clearly different given the designer's broad freedom for packaging boxes, so individual character was present.
  • The invalidity application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberJessica Norma LEWIS
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
frFrenchoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000115888

vs SEDA INTERNATIONAL PACKAGING GROUP SPA

2022-02-09Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098
000115908

vs SEDA INTERNATIONAL PACKAGING GROUP SPA

2022-02-08Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098
000104119

vs Dzhihangir Ibryam

2019-10-17Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098
000103859

vs PHOENIX IND SA

2019-07-26Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098
000011140

vs GAMMA-A, SIA

2019-02-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098
000011251

vs Guy Vanhoutte

2019-01-28Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098
000102462

vs TURCU GEANI-CRISTIAN

2018-12-21Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098
000102465

vs TURCU GEANI-CRISTIAN

2018-12-21Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)098